Authority Vis-à-vis Scientific Logic: A Critique of the Epistemological Foundations of Fiqh
Abstract
This paper explores the epistemological problem of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh), which is often celebrated for its flexibility. The main question addressed is why fiqh continues to survive despite its weak logical structure when measured against the standards of formal logic. Positioned within the framework of philosophy of science and mantiq (logic), this study argues that the resilience of fiqh does not stem from logical consistency but rather from its role as an authoritative system. The analysis focuses on three critical aspects: the definitional ambiguity of key concepts that fail to fulfill the criterion of jāmi‘ wa māni’, the analogical reasoning (qiyās) that frequently relies on assumed causality instead of demonstrative proofs (burhān), and the legal maxims (qawā‘id al-fiqhiyyah) that tend to operate as post-decision justifications rather than guiding principles of reasoning. These weaknesses indicate that fiqh is closer to a system of authority than to a discipline of science in the strict sense. Nevertheless, the same weaknesses paradoxically contribute to its adaptability and persistence across different eras. The paper concludes that fiqh is strong in praxis but fragile in theory, and it recommends an epistemological reconstruction through precise definitional work, strengthening qiyās with demonstrative causality, and reformulating legal maxims with objective parameters. Such reconstruction would enable fiqh to transform from a primarily authoritative tradition into a rational, systematic, and contextually relevant body of knowledge.
Downloads
References
Al-Amidi, A. ibn M. (1984). Al-Ihkām fī Ushūl al-Ahkām (Juz I). Dar al-Kitab al-’Arabi.
Al-Ghazali, A. H. (2000). Al-Mustashfā fī Ilmi al-Ushūl. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Jabiri, M. A. (1989). Takwin al-’Aql al-’Arabiy. Markaz Dirasat al-Wahdah al-’Arabiyah.
Amin, M. A. (2022). Qiyas Sebagai Sumber Hukum Islam. Syariah: Journal of Islamic Law, 4(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.22373/sy.v4i2.622
Anam, M. K. (2022). Dasar-Dasar Istinbath Hukum Imam Syafi’i. Al-Ihda’: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran, 14(1), 316–342. https://doi.org/10.55558/alihda.v14i1.25
As-Suyuthi, J. A. (1983). al-Asybah wa al-Nadzhair. Dar al-Kutub al-’Ilmiyyah.
As-Syatibi, A. I. (2012). Al-Muwafaqot fi Ushul as-Syariah. Al-Maktabah At-Taufiqiyah.
Bakhtiar, A. (2013). Filsafat Ilmu. Rajawali Press.
Dedi, S. (2020). Ushul Fiqih Menurut Paradigma Filsafat Ilmu (Kajian Ontologi, Epistemologi, dan Aksiologi). Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 5(2), 289. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v5i2.1829
Djalil, A. B. (2009). Logika (Ilmu Mantiq). Kencana.
Djazuli, A. (2006). Ilmu Fiqh: Penggalian, Perkembangan dan Penerapan Hukum Islam. Kencana.
Djazuli, A. (2019). Kaidah-Kaidah Fikih: Kaidah-Kaidah Hukum Islam dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah-Masalah yang Praktis. Kencana.
El-Fadl, K. A. (2014). Reasoning With God: Reclaiming Shari’ah in the Modern Age. Rowman and Littlefield.
Fahriana, L., & Muslimin, J. (2020). Penerapan al-Qawā‘id al-Uṣuliyyah dan al-Qawā‘id al-Fiqhiyah dalam Kasus Riba dan Bank Syari’ah. Jurnal Indo-Islamika, 10(2), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.15408/idi.v10i2.17527
Fasya, G. (2021). Prinsip Dan Aplikasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dalam Bisnis Modern. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 1(1), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.56145/jurnalekonomidanbisnis.v1i1.90
Fauzi, I. (2025). Mengungkap Dinamika Hukum Islam: Telaah Kritis terhadap An Introduction to Islamic Law Karya Wael B. Hallaq. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 12(2), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v12i2.4082
Firdaus, F., Qomaruddin, M., Nengsih, W., & Hajam, H. (2024). Pendekatan Kalam Ibnu Rusyd (Analisis Studi Islam Pendekatan Teologis Nalar Burhani). Sharia: Jurnal Kajian Islam, 1(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.59757/sharia.v1i2.53
Firdaus, R. (2019). Perbedaan Pandangan Fuqaha Ihwal Bunga Bank dan Riba. EKONOMIKA SYARIAH: Journal of Economic Studies, 3(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.30983/es.v3i2.2150
Hallaq, W. B. (2004). Authority, Continuity and Change in Islamic Law. Cambridge University Press.
Hasibuan, M. A. S. (2020). Telaah Ta’arud al-Adillah atas Hadis-Hadis tentang Pembacaan Salam dalam Salat yang Memakai Wabarakatuh dan Tanpa Wabarakatuh. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 8(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v8i2.2218
Jamal, A. (2024). Ijtihad dan Qiyas Menurut Imam Syafi’i: Hubungan Qiyas dengan Berbagai Metode Ijtihad dalam Ushul Fiqh. MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.v4i1.3125
Junaedi, M. (2018). Fikih Indonesia: Epistemologi Sosio-Kultural. 9(2), 291.
Karmawan, K. (2025). Fiqh dan Konstruksi Pemikirannya: Upaya Menjawab Isu-Isu Kontemporer di Masyarakat. ISLAMIKA, 17(2), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.33592/islamika.v17i2.4339
Khalil, W. A. (2022). القياس عند المعتزلة دراسة وتقويما. Mahakim: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 2(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.30762/mahakim.v2i1.108
Majdi, A. L. (2019). Metodologi Pembaruan Neomodernisme dan Rekonstruksi Pemikiran Islam Fazlur Rahman. NALAR: Jurnal Peradaban Dan Pemikiran Islam, 3(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.23971/njppi.v3i1.1196
Mundofi, A. A. (2024). Pengaruh Mantiq (logika) Dalam Perkembangan Ilmu Keislaman di Era Modern. Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Agama Islam, 14(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.69879/8sasz291
Muqaddam, M. M. (2014). Pelajaran Mantiq: Perkenalan Dasar-Dasar Logika Muslim. Rausyanfikr Institute.
Nazar, R. F. (2021). Corak Pembaruan Pemikiran Hukum Islam dalam Konsep Fiqh Sosial K.H Sahal Mahfudh. Asy-Syari’ah, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v23i1.9262
Nazar, R. F., & Abdul Hamid, M. F. (2022). Tracking the Genealogical Reasoning Reconstruction of Nahdlatul Ulama Fiqh: From Social Fiqh to Civilization Fiqh. Tashwirul Afkar, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.51716/ta.v41i2.74
Noor, F. A. (2019). Karakteristik Sains dalam Pemikiran Filosofis Kontemporer (Tinjauan Filsafat Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman). AL-MURABBI: Jurnal Studi Kependidikan Dan Keislaman, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.53627/jam.v6i1.3630
Popper, K. R. (2008). Logika Penemuan Ilmiah. Pustaka Pelajar.
Praja, J. S. (1988). Epistemologi Hukum Islam. IAIN Jakarta.
Purwanto, M. R., Marazi, H., & Nafid, A. A. (2024). Application Impact of Imam al-Shafi’i’s Qiyas on the Development of Islamic Legal Thought. MADANIA: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 28(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.29300/madania.v28i1.4219
Rahman, F. (1994). Islam dan Modernitas: Tentang Transformasi Intelektual. Pustaka.
Rofiq, N., & Hasbi, M. Z. N. (2021). Mendamaikan Tradisi Muslim dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Modern. The International Journal of Pegon: Islam Nusantara Civilization, 6(02), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.51925/inc.v6i02.51
Roy, M. (2004). Ushul Fiqih Madzhab Aristoteles: Pelacakan Logika Aristoteles dalam Qiyas Ushul Fiqh. Safiria Insania Press.
Roziqi, A. K., & Ni’am, S. (2025). Metodologi Kajian Islam: Studi Analisis Hukum Fiqh dalam Pendekatan Rasional Argumentatif (Metode Burhani). Mahad Aly Journal of Islamic Studies, 1(1), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.63398/jsimahadaly.v1i1.40
Sambas, S. (2012). Mantik: Kaidah Berpikir Islami. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Taufiq, M., & Syarkawi, T. (2022). Fleksibilitas Hukum Fiqh dalam Merespons Perubahan Zaman. Jurnal Al-Nadhair, 1(01), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.61433/alnadhair.v1i01.7
Yusran, Musyahid, A., & Akmal, A. (2025). Kaidah-Kaidah Fikih dalam Kondisi Menyulitkan: Kajian atas Kaidah Pokok, Cabang, dan Penerapannya. JIMU: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisipliner, 3(03), 2200–2211. https://doi.org/10.70294/jimu.v3i03.1003
Yuwono, A. A. Y. (2024). Epistemologi Falsifikasi; Implikasi Pemikiran Karl Raimund Popper terhadap Kajian Keilmuan Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Spiritualis: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Dan Tasawuf, 10(2), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.53429/spiritualis.v10i2.1017
Zaharudin, Suhada, Aribathi, A. H., & Devana, V. T. (2021). Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan Islam Berbasis Teknologi Dalam Perspektif Epistemologi. Alfabet Jurnal Wawasan Agama Risalah Islamiah, Teknologi Dan Sosial, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.34306/alwaarits.v1i1.23

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


















