Kontra Narasi atas Tanggapan Ibnu Rusyd terhadap Imam Al-Ghazali Terkait Apostesi Filosof

Criticizing Ibnu Rusyd's Response to Imam Al Ghazali Regarding the Apostestion of Philosophers

  • Ahmad Hidhir Adib UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Ahmad Dliyauddin UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Luthfi Karimatun Nisa' UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Narse Nur Afida Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35878/islamicreview.v13i1.1082
Keywords: Eskatologi, Al-Ghazali, Ibnu Rusyd, Filosof, Kritik

Abstract

The dialogue between Imam Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd is one of the most monumental stories in the study of Islamic philosophy, in which his criticism of Al-Ghazali is refuted by Ibn Rushd with his various arguments. The purpose of this article is to strengthen Imam Al-Ghazali's criticism of the philosophical eschatological paradigm. The research method used is descriptive qualitative. The results of this study indicate that (1) Imam Al-Ghazali sentenced the philosophers to be disbelievers who held this view of nature as eternality, God does not know the details, and the resurrection of the soul on the Day of Judgment. (2) However, this verdict was criticized by Ibn Rushd. That nature is eternal, because its existence coincides with the beginning of time. Then this knowledge of God has nothing to do with a detailed or global model of knowledge, because God is the substance that causes an object to exist. Then this religious text is metaphorical in nature, so it is not certain that it is the body that is resurrected. (3) It's just that, the majority of scholars' from Sunni circles support Imam Al-Ghazali's statement. They based it on religious texts QS. Al-Hadid verse 3 about the eternality of nature, QS Al-An'am verse 28 regarding the knowledge of God, and QS Al-Kahf verse 47 and Al-Anbiya '104 regarding the resurrection of the body.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Andalusi, Abu Hayyan. Al-Bahr Al-Muhith. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, 1998.
Al-Baghawi, Abu Muhammad Al-Farra’. Ma’alim Al-Tanzil Fi Tafsir Al-Qur’an. Riyadh: Dar Thaybah, 1997.
Al-Baijuri, Ibrahim. Tahqiq Al-Maqam Ala Kifayat Al-Awam Fi Ilm Al-Kalam. Beirut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyah, 2007.
Al-Bijirimi, Sulaiman. Tuhfat Al-Habib Ala Syarh Al-Khatib. Beirut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah, 2020.
Al-Buthi, Said Ramadhan. Kubra Al-Yaqiniyyat Al-Kauniyyah. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, 1997.
Al-dimasyqi, Abu al-fida’ Ibnu Katsir. Tafsir Al-Quran Al-Adzim. Beirut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah, 2020.
Al-Dimyathi, Abu Bakar Syatha’. I’anah Al-Thalibin Fi Hall Alfadz Fath Al-Mu’in. Beirut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah, 2020.
Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid Muhammad. Al-Munqidz Min Al-Dhalal. Jeddah: Dar Al-Minhaj, 2010.
———. Faishal Al-Tafriqah Bayna Al-Islam Wa Al-Zindiqah. Istanbul: Dar Al-Bayruti, 1993.
———. Ihya’ Ulum Al-Din. Beirut: Dar Al-Ma’rifah, 2020.
———. Ma’arij Al-Quds Fi Madarij Ma’rifat Al-Nafs. Beirut: Dar Al-Afaq Al-Jadidah, 1975.
———. Maqashid Al-Falasifah. Damaskus: Mathba’ah Al-Shabbah, 2000.
———. Qawa’id Al-Aqaid. Beirut: Alam Al-Kutub, 1985.
———. Tahafut Al-Falasifah. Kairo: Dar Al-Ma’arif, n.d.
Al-Hafid, Ibnu Rusyd. Fashl Al-Maqal. Kairo: Dar Al-Ma’arif, n.d.
———. Tahafut Al-Tahafut. Beirut: Markaz Dirasat Al-Wihdah Al-Arabiyyah, 1998.
Al-Haitami, Ibnu Hajar. Al-Fatawa Al-Haditsiyyah. Beirut: Dar Al-Fikr, 2001.
———. Al-I’lam Bi Qawathi’ Al-Islam. Damaskus: Dar Al-Taqwa, 2008.
Al-Jauziyyah, Ibnu Qayyim. Al-Fawaid. Beirut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyah, 1973.
Al-Jazairi, Thahir. Jawahir Al-Kalamiyyah. Beirut: Dar Ibnu Hazm, 1986.
Al-Jurjani, Ali bin Muhammad. Syarh Al-Mawaqif. Kairo: Mathba’ah Al-Sa’adah, n.d.
Al-Nawawi, Muhyiddin Yahya. Al-Minhaj Syarh Sahih Muslim. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ Turats Al-Arabi, 2015.
Al-Qasimi, Jamaluddin. Mahasin Al-Ta’wil. Beirut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyah, 2001.
Al-Qurthubi, Syamsuddin Abu Abdillah. Al-Jami’ Li Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Kairo: Dar Al-Kutub Al-Misriyyah, 1964.
Al-Razi, Fakhruddin. Mafatih Al-Ghaib. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ Turats Al-Arabi, n.d.
Al-Suyuthi, Jalaluddin., and Jalaluddin Al-Mahalli. Tafsir Al-Jalalain. Kairo: Dar Al-Hadis, n.d.
Al-Taftazani, Sa’duddin. Syarh AL-Maqashid Fi Ilm Al-Kalam. Islamabad: Dar Al-Ma’arif Al-Nu’maniyyah, 1981.
Arafat, Gusti Yasser. “Membongkar Isi Pesan Dan Media Dengan Content Analysis Gusti Yasser Arafat UIN Antasari Banjarmasin.” Jurnal Alhadrah 17, no. 33 (2018): 32–48. https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id.
Arifin, Azis, and Jaipuri Harahap. “Kritik Al-Ghazali Terhadap Para Filsuf.” Aqlania 12, no. 1 (2021): 75. https://doi.org/10.32678/aqlania.v12i1.4375.
Fauziah, Ruyatul. “Kebangkitan Manusia Di Akhirat Menurut Al-Ghazali Dan Ibnu Rusyd.” Aqlania 9, no. 2 (2018): 193. https://doi.org/10.32678/aqlania.v9i02.2066.
M. Mustholiq Alwi. “Doktrin Eskatologi Al-Ghazali Dalam Menanamkan Karakter Di Pondok Pesantren Suryabuana Magelang.” INJECT: Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication 2, no. 2 (2017): 275–94.
Mubit, Rizal. “Pembelaan Ibnu Rusyd Terhadap Pemikiran Filosof.” Jurnal Miyah 11, no. 01 (2016): 132–50.
Munir, Ghazali. “Kritik Al-Ghazālī Terhadap Para Filosof.” Jurnal THEOLOGIA 25, no. 1 (2016): 143–58. https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2014.25.1.341.
Mustofa, Dedi. “Ilmu Dalam Perspektif Al-Ghazali Dan Ibnu Rusyd.” Tafahus: Jurnal Pengkajian Islam 1, no. 1 (2021): 55–78. https://doi.org/10.58573/tafahus.v1i1.5.
Pemikiran, Jejak, Al-ghazali D A N Ibnu, and Akilah Mahmud. “Dalam Perkembangan Teologi Islam” 13 (2019).
Ridwan, Muhammad Mahfuh. “Kafirnya Filsuf Muslim: Ibn Rusyd Meluruskan Al-Ghazali.” Jurnal Kontemplasi 4, no. 01 (2016): 165–78.
Sibawaihi. Eskatologi Al-Ghazali Dan Fazlur Rahman. Yogyakarta: Islamika, 2004.
Susanti, Fitria Rika, and Surma Hayani. “Pemikiran Filosofis Ibnu Rusyd Tentang Eskatologi (Kajian Tentang Kehidupan Di Akhirat).” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuludin 20, no. 1 (2021): 15–29. https://doi.org/10.18592/jiiu.v.
Tedy, Armin. “Kritik Ibnu Rusyd Terhadap Tiga Kerancuan Berfikir Al-Ghazali.” El-Afkar: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman Dan Tafsir Hadis 5, no. 1 (2016): 11–20.
Yalmon, Adi. “Analisis Kritis Tentang Polemik Imam Alghazali Dan Ibnu Rusyd Tentang Kebangkitan Jasmani.” Jurnal Pelangi 3, no. 2 (2011). https://doi.org/10.22202/jp.2011.v3i2.20.
Published
2024-04-30
How to Cite
Adib, A., Dliyauddin, A., Nisa’, L., & Afida, N. (2024). Kontra Narasi atas Tanggapan Ibnu Rusyd terhadap Imam Al-Ghazali Terkait Apostesi Filosof. Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Keislaman, 13(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35878/islamicreview.v13i1.1082
Issue
Vol 13 No 1 (2024): April 2024
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta

Penulis yang menerbitkan bersama Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Keislaman menyetujui ketentuan berikut:

  1. Penulis mempertahankan hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak publikasi pertama dengan karya yang dilisensikan secara bersamaan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk berbagi karya dengan pengakuan kepenulisan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini.
  2. Penulis dapat membuat pengaturan kontrak tambahan yang terpisah untuk distribusi non-eksklusif dari versi jurnal yang diterbitkan dari karya tersebut (misalnya, mempostingnya ke repositori institusi atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan awal publikasi di jurnal ini.
  3. Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk memposting karya mereka secara online (misalnya, di repositori institusional atau di situs web mereka) sebelum dan selama proses pengiriman, karena dapat menghasilkan pertukaran yang produktif, serta kutipan lebih awal dan lebih besar dari karya yang diterbitkan.

Creative Commons License
Karya ini dilisensikan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.