استراتيجية حل المشكلات جون ديوي في تعليم الصرف

  • Irfatin Maisaroh UIN Walisongo Semarang
  • Raodah Saidillah Institut Pesantren Mathali'ul Falah
  • Ali Subhan Institut Pesantren Mathali'ul Falah
Keywords: Problem Solving, Sharaf Teaching, Amtsilah Tashrifiyyah

Abstract

Sharaf teaching and learning especially by using Amtsilah Tashrifiyyah, is usually use traditional methods such as lecture method and memorizing method. So that students' abilities only reach the stage of memorization, without being able to apply them in speaking (kalām), reading (qirā'ah), and writing (kitābah). Yet all these mahārahs cannot be separated from sharaf or morphology. So there is need to use teaching models that can encourage students’ critical thinking and improve their abilities in applying sharaf material. Therefore, this study aims to describe John Dewey's problem solving model in sharaf learning. This research is a library research with qualitative approaches and descriptive methods. The results of this study show that: John Dewey's problem solving model in Amtsilah Tashrifiyyah learning can be described in a design that contains elements of the learning model including learning syntax, social systems in the classroom, reaction principles, and support systems that complement learning. As for the operational steps of learning: first, it starts with the planning stage to determine goals and other learning elements that depart from the principle of familiarizing students to solve problems with the aim of acquiring knowledge and abilities. Second, the implementation stage consists of six steps; formulating problems, analyzing problems, formulating hypotheses, collecting data, testing hypotheses, and compiling problem-solving recommendations. Third, the assessment stage which includes cognitive aspects through written tests, and affective aspects through observation of student participation in problem-solving activities. Hopefully this research will be able to give a positive contribution to Sharaf's learning model which is innovative and based on analysis and problem solving.

 

References

El Akiki, Carole, and Alain Content. 2020. “Early Sensitivity to Morphology in Beginning Readers of Arabic.” Frontiers in Psychology 11(September):1–16. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552315.
Dewey, John. 1910. How We Think. Chicago: D. C. Heath & Co Publisher.
Dewey, John, and Morris R. Cohen. n.d. “EXPERIENCE & EDUCATION.”
Mawaddah, Siti Lum’atul. 2022. “Problematika Pembelajaran Nahwu Menggunakan Metode Klasik Arab Pegon Di Era Modern.” Maharaat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab 4(2):102–19. doi: 10.18196/mht.v4i2.12976.
Mulyatno, CB. 2011. “Demokrasi Sebagai Pola Hidup Menurut John Dewey.” Jurnal Diskursus 10(1):8.
Rostitawati, Tita. 2014. “Konsep Pendidikan John Dewey.” Tadbir: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam 2(2).
Sahrir, Mohamad Lukman Al Hakim Md. Noor dan Muhammad Sabri. 2019. “Difficulties of Learning Arabic Morphology Reasons and Solutions I’lal and Ibdal as an Example.” Jurnal Bahasa Dan Linguistik 1(1):69.
Sulasmono, Bambang Suteng. 2012. “PROBLEM SOLVING: SIGNIFIKANSI, PENGERTIAN, DAN RAGAMNYA.” Satya Widya 28(2):155. doi: 10.24246/j.sw.2012.v28.i2.p155-166.
Weil, Bruce Joyce dan Marsha. 2003. Models of Teaching 5th Edition. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.
Wijaya, Helaluddin dan Hengki. 2019. Analisis Data Kualitatif: Sebuah Tinjauan Teori & Praktik. Makassar: Sekolah Tinggi Theologia Jaffray.
الحلواني, محمد خير. 1987. الواضح في الصرف. دمشق: دار المأمون للتراث.
الطيطي, محمد أحمد أبو سمرة ومحمد عبد الإله. 2019. مناهج البحث العلمي من التبيين إلى التمكين. عمان: مجموعة اليازوري العلمي للنشر والتوزيع.
الغلاييني, مصطفى. 1994. جامع الدروس العربية. بيروت: المكتبة العصرية.
الفاخري, سالم عبد الله. 2018. سيكلوجية الإبداع. عمان: مركز الكتاب الأكاديمي.
جديدي, محمد. 2004. فلسفة الخبرة “جون ديوي نموذجا.” بيروت: المؤسسة الجامعية للدراسات والنشر والتوزيع.
ديوﻱ, جوﻥ. 1945. الديمقراطية والتربية. edited by م. ع. و. ميخائيل. القاهرة: مطبعة لجنة التأليف والترجمة والنشر
Published
2024-04-30
Section
Articles